While it is usual to see how the studies on health can be improved through the use of some, particularly rich in vitamins and minerals, this is not the same for the Real McCoy. How? Ask yourself and are looking for a beer (or a Pub Med search or scientific articles) about how often to see a study - the study - to a certain fruit and vegetables on a number of improvements in health. It is not a group, but some fruits and vegetables. And the proof of health, illness is not (this is an important difference). We're talking about a true science is not just a couple of things in science mother or the health of the mother. And here we are talking about a real fruit and vegetables such as broccoli or an apple, in particular, as opposed to a group of fruit or vegetables. In other words, we are talking about something very real, and not all summary - this is a real scientific study is very useful: it is not abstract, or is not science. And, above all, if I may, and it is not possible, it is scientifically proven. Period. How? Which vegetables? What are the benefits? There are many leaders in the consumption of fruit and vegetables and many of them as a strong mandate from Harvard, Tufts, 5 meals a day, and so on (for an excellent Goggle search of fruit and vegetables and public health or health). For example, the site of Harvard, the last diet that "appeal to three of the five to ten servings of fruits and vegetables a day, according to a l \ 'caloric intake. For a person who responds to the needs of 2,000 calories a daily for weight and health in nine people, or 4 ½ cups per day. "The quote is from the USDA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It is an abstraction, but not a guide on some fruits and vegetables, and how it can be promoted and your health. But most of what these institutions to promote the air - not scientific studies, health effects of a single fruit or vegetable that is found on the website of Harvard University, not one. It 'true that \ look beautiful, the air, but still. Now we are no longer talking about real research on fruit and vegetables, as in this case in Pub Med, "Electron and gamma irradiation effectively reduce Listeria monocytogenes population of chopped Romaine lettuce" (J Food Prot March 2006, 69 (3) :570-4, for those who need to know). This research is the impact of the promotion of health eating, in this case, Romaine lettuce. And there is not anything different than what it is. Of course, the pages of health promotion, the benefits of eating fruits and vegetables could be part of scientific studies and Don \ 't bother, visitors of all figures and scientific names of beet or plum. O farmers, develop really good things and how to purchase. I remember a study on green vegetables and folic acid and some children on an island in the South Pacific. The study, a real scientific study had to be discontinued because the scientists, such as children, the study may not have enough folic acid to their diet of fresh vegetables, vegetable, because it was insufficient. Thus, the study was stopped because of ethics, so that children \ 's essential element of the system could be harmful to them - especially if the evidence of science, children are not on a natural diet. So much for promoting the health benefits of this group of vegetables - and I have not seen another study to refute this single remote control device, in particular as regards scientific research and vegetables just as promoting human health. How do we know whether the fruit or vegetables you can really improve health? Simple answer is that you don \ 't So, if you eat more fruit and vegetables, what would happen? All of these diseases would be to write to Pub Med and Tufts nutritionists quotes and coverage on the history of our nation, fat for Time Magazine: eat fruits and vegetables and staying healthy, or until we know something different.